INVENTORY & OBSOLESCENCE GOVERNANCE

Inventory governance is not a one-off clearance; it is stopping risk from regenerating.

8–16 weeks to unify the obsolescence definition, identify structural build-up, connect future demand, ownership and disposition actions, and establish a standing cash-flow-oriented governance mechanism.

TYPICAL DURATION8–16 weeks
OBJECTRisk inventory and its generation mechanism
BUSINESS GOALInventory structure and cash efficiency
REFERENCE INVESTMENTMid six figures RMBReference ¥400k–1m, depending on material scope and plants
01

COMMON MISREADS

Looking only at totals, ageing or a single disposition hides the structural problem.

01

The obsolescence definition keeps changing by department and system

02

Safety stock, strategic stock and genuine risk stock are mixed together

03

Future demand, substitution and order changes cannot be judged together

04

Disposition actions are recorded, but ownership, deadlines and outcomes are not closed

05

While old stock is cleared, purchasing and planning keep generating new risk

02

HOW TO JUDGE

Four questions that settle what kind of problem this is.

Definition consistency

Ask six functions to classify the same batch of materials — do the answers agree?

Data availability

Do the consumption, in-transit and substitution fields the judgment needs actually exist, and arrive in time?

Ownership

Across identification, decision, disposal and prevention, which step has no named owner?

Regeneration

After the last clean-up, did risk stock simply grow back?

The obsolescence definition and RACI template can be used internally to align the definition before anything else.

03

RISK CLASSIFICATION

Separate inventory of different natures first; only then do management actions mean anything.

01

Normal operating inventory

Supported by stable demand, replenishment policy and a reasonable cycle

02

Strategic inventory

Formed for supply risk, customer commitments or critical resources, with an explicit policy

03

Excess and slow-moving inventory

Consumable in future, but quantity, pace or policy needs adjustment

04

Obsolete and risk inventory

No credible future demand; needs substitution, return, redeployment or disposal

05

Disputed inventory

Frozen because quality, design, customer or ownership questions are unresolved

04

GOVERNANCE LOOP

Identify, decide, execute and prevent must form a loop.

  1. 01

    Unified identification

    Form the risk list from material, demand, ageing, substitutability and future consumption.

  2. 02

    Tiered decisions

    Distinguish keep, consume, substitute, redeploy, return and scrap strategies.

  3. 03

    Owned execution

    Name the responsible department and person, committed date, expected value and blockers.

  4. 04

    Review and prevention

    Go back to sales, design, planning, purchasing and change processes to close the generation mechanism.

05

DATA FOUNDATION

Inventory facts must connect to the future, not only look back.

Base data

  • Material master, batches, ageing and value
  • Historical consumption, future demand and open purchase orders
  • BOM, substitution relationships, design and order changes
  • Quality status, ownership and disposition records

Key rules

  • One definition of risk and obsolescence
  • Defined data cut-off and trusted sources
  • Exception, approval and escalation authority
  • Every disposition outcome traceable and reviewable
06

MEASUREMENT

Look at results, process and new risk at the same time.

Risk inventory share

Risk structure and trend under one definition

Inventory turns

Observed by business, plant, category and lifecycle

Disposition progress

Committed actions, completion, blockers and overdue ownership

Cash released

Verified value from consumption, return, redeployment and disposal

New risk

Sources and change of risk generated during the governance period

07

RELATED PRACTICE

The actual work behind these methods.

Inventory and obsolescence governance

Our core team members participated in this project. The work aligned definitions, connected demand and consumption plans, and built tiered control, named ownership, disposal tracking and warnings.

Factory transparency and lean operations

Our core team members participated in this project. The work unified business objects and data definitions across planning, purchasing, warehousing, production and cost.

Related practice →

08

STARTING CONDITIONS

Inventory governance needs cross-functional participation.

Ready to start

Inventory already affects cash flow or operations, a scope can be chosen, and sales, R&D, planning, purchasing, production and finance confirm ownership together.

Preparation

Agree the governance scope and ownership mechanism, and set up the conditions for ongoing adjustment of demand, purchasing, change and disposition processes.

NEXT STEP

Bring the operating problem
you most want to change.

Delivery, inventory, operating visibility or a workflow where AI could help. Share your situation and priorities so we can identify a practical next step together.